检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔡露[1] CAI Lu(Xiehe College of Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350007, China)
出 处:《龙岩学院学报》2016年第3期58-62,共5页Journal of Longyan University
摘 要:纠错性反馈一直是二语习得研究中的热门话题,而显性和隐性纠错反馈作为两种截然不同的纠错反馈方式,也受到越来越多的关注。许多研究者致力于探究显性和隐性纠错反馈是如何促进二语习得的及两者是否具有不同的功效,这些研究充分揭示了显性与隐性纠错反馈的差别和有效性,对纠错性反馈的应用有重要的启示作用。教师在进行纠错性反馈时不仅应确保其纠错意图与纠错力度足够明显和纠错性反馈的方式和时机更加灵活,而且还应关注学生的情绪。Corrective feedback has been a popular topic in second language acquisition research. Explicit and implicit corrective feedbacks, as two different types of corrective feedback, have (ira'wn more and more attention. Many researchers have explored how Tthese twTo types of corrective feedback facilitate the second language acquisition and whether they are different in efficacy. These studies are significant in that they reveal the differences and effectiveness of explicit and implicit corrective feedbacks as wTell as the implications of implementation. In applying the corrective feedbacks, teachers should not only ensure that their intentions and attempts of correction are obvious and that the wTays and timing of corrective feedbacks are flexible but also concern about the students'emotions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117