文明国家(中国与美国)的“自我约束力”问题探析  

China and the United States: Civilized Nations' Self- discipline

作　　者：杨胜兰[1] YANG Sheng-lan(School of Philosophy, Law and politics, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China)

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学哲学与法政学院,上海200234

出　　处：《齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第12期33-36,44,共5页Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：中国与美国都是两种不同文明的核心代表,中国作为儒家文明的核心国家,而美国是西方文明的核心国家。两国"自我约束能力"方面各具特色,但是存在约束能力强弱的区分。两国的文明源自各自不同的历史发展,中国作为大陆文明的表现,在对外发展中表现为和平、互利与共赢,传承海洋文明的美国的表现则恰恰相反,对外发展的过程带有一定的掠夺性。作为文明国家,而且都是重要的世界性大国,"自我约束能力"对于世界的和平与发展都起着举足轻重的作用,但现实的世界格局中并不是这样,往往强权即霸权,"自我约束能力"会有文明的基因表达。China and the United States are two different civilizations, China, core country of Confucian civilization, while the United States the core country of western civilization. Their self-discipline has different characteristics, but there are distinctions in the constraints strength. Two civilizations originated differently. The performance of China's Mainland shows peace t , mutual benefit and win-win features. The United States' marine cultural is more or less aggressive. As a civilized country, and important world power, selfdiscipline plays an important role in world peace but the real world is contrary. Mighty power tends to be hegemonic power. Self-discipline will bear civilized gene expression.

关 键 词：中国 美国 文明国家 儒家文明 西方文明 

分 类 号：D032[政治法律—政治学]