财政性教育投入影响FDI的区位选择吗?——基于人力资本流动视角的实证研究  

Does Financial Education Investment Affect Location Selection of FDI?: An Empirical Research Based on the Perspective of Human Capital Flow

作　　者：吴伟伟[1] 章禄禄 Weiwei Wu;Lulu Zhang(School of Economics & Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China, 330031)

机构地区：[1]南昌大学经济管理学院,南昌330031

出　　处：《教育与经济》2017年第1期48-58,共11页Education & Economy

基　　金：江西省教育科学"十三五"规划项目"人力资本流动视角下分级教育投入对FDI区位选择的影响研究"(项目编号:16YB015)

摘　　要：在满足严格假定条件下,财政性教育投入可以通过提高人力资本水平,吸引FDI进入,然而当存在区域工资差异,并且人力资本可以跨区流动,这一效应变得不确定。利用省级面板数据,采用固定效应模型验证各层级财政性教育投入对不同类型FDI区位选择的影响,研究发现:高等教育投入和基础教育投入对制造业FDI的影响均不显著;高等教育投入对生产性服务业FDI的影响不显著,基础教育投入对生产性服务业FDI产生了正向的影响;基础教育投入与高等教育投入虽然都影响到了非生产性服务业FDI,但系数为负,与经典理论假说不符。总体上仍然是传统因素在影响FDI的区位选择,各层级财政性教育投入并没有帮助到本地区FDI的进入。Under the condition of meeting strict assumptions, financial education investment could attract the inflow of FDI by raising the level of local human capital. However, when regional differences in wages exist and human capital can flow across the regions, this effect becomes uncertain. By using provincial panel data, the fixed effects model is applied to verify the impact of different levels financial education investments on location selection of various types of FDI. The study has found: 1)both higher education investment and elementary education investment have insignificant impact on manufacturing FDI; 2)higher education investment has insignificant effect on productive services FDI, whereas elementary education investment has positive impact on FDI in productive services; 3)although both elementary education investment and higher education investment affect the non-productive services FDI significantly, the coefficient is negative, which does not correspond with the classical hypothesis. As a whole, the traditional factors still influence the location selection of FDI,and financial education investments at all levels do not help entrance of local FDI.

关 键 词：财政性教育投入 FDI 人力资本流动 

分 类 号：F08[经济管理—政治经济学] G40-054[文化科学—教育学原理]