检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王腾[1,2] 严良 何建华[2] 郑世刚[2] WANG Teng;YAN Liang;HE Jian-hua;ZHENG Shi-gang(Research Center of Resources and Environmental Economics, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China;School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China)
机构地区:[1]中国地质大学(武汉)资源环境经济研究中心,湖北武汉430074 [2]中国地质大学(武汉)经济管理学院,湖北武汉430074
出 处:《中国环境科学》2017年第4期1571-1578,共8页China Environmental Science
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(12JZD034);国家社会科学基金项目(12BJL074)
摘 要:通过搜集中国2000~2014年数据,运用DEA-Malmquist指数测算中国30个省域全要素能源效率,并进一歩分解求得技术水平、纯技术效率和规模效率.为验证环境规制与全要素能源效率间波特假说是否存在,分別运用环境规制对规模效率、纯技术效率、技术水平和全要素能源效率进行面板门限回归.结果表明:技术水平退步是我国全要素能源效率下降的主要原因.环境规制对规模效率的影响为负,波特假说不成立.环境规制与纯技术效率存在单门限效应,且环境规制在不同区间对纯技术效率的影响均为正,波特假说始终成立.环境规制与全要素能源效率和技术水平均存在单门限效应,当环境规制强度低于0.0002吋,环境规制对全要素能源效率和技术水平的影响为正,此时波特假说成立;而当环境规制强度超过0.0002吋,环境规制对全要素能源效率和技术水平影响为负,此时波特假说不成立.因此,政府制定环境规制政策需要考虑到环境规制强度对规模效率、纯技术效率和技术水平效果的差异.The total factor energy efficiency of China's30provincial administrative regions during2000~2014was estimated based on DEA-Malmquist index.Then the total factor energy efficiency was decomposed into technical level,pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency.To testify the Potter hypothesis,the panel threshold regression model was adopted to simulate the environmental regulation on total factor energy efficiency,technical level,scale efficiency and pure technical efficiency.Results showed that technical level regression constituted a major cause for the decline of total factor energy efficiency in China.Environmental regulation exerted a negative influence on the scale efficiency,indicating Potter hypothesis as invalid.Single threshold existed between environmental regulation and pure technical efficiency,and there was a positive impact at different intervals,revealing the existence of Porter hypothesis.The impact of environmental regulation on total factor energy efficiency and technical level was positive when the environmental regulation was less than0.0002,and the Porter hypothesis was correspondingly valid.Otherwise,it didn't stand.Therefore,government should formulate environmental regulation policy after considering varied effect on technical level,pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency.
关 键 词:环境规制 全要素能源效率 波特假说 DEA-MALMQUIST指数 门限回归
分 类 号:X24[环境科学与工程—环境科学] F062.1[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38