转换与选择之进路:商谈式民事诉讼模式  

Transformation and selection approach: Civil litigation mode of negotiation

作　　者：陈文曲[1] 陈哲[1] CHEN Wenqu;CHEN Zhe(School of Law, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院,湖南长沙410083

出　　处：《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第3期55-62,共8页Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences

基　　金：湖南省社会科学课题"‘商谈式’诉讼模式研究"(XSP17YBZC203);中南大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目"‘商谈式’诉讼模式研究--以审判为中心为背景"(2016zzts178)

摘　　要：学界对我国现行民事诉讼模式的定位存在着一定偏差。我国民事诉讼模式受多重因素影响,现阶段应是一种多元化的民事诉讼模式,但此种模式弊病诸多,究其原因是缺乏一套完整理论来统摄。在纠纷解决体系中,现代民事诉讼表现为一种规范化的全面合理性沟通平台,而哈贝马斯提出的交往合理性以及商谈伦理与现代诉讼的本质特征不谋而合。商谈式民事诉讼模式正是交往合理性的体现,或许此种模式不失为我国民事诉讼模式转型之进路。Currently in the academic circle,there is some deviation about the position of China's civil litigation mode.The civil litigation mode in China is affected by many factors,and it is a diversified mode at this stage.However,this mode also has many defects,the reason for which is the lack of a set of complete theory.In the dispute resolution system,modern civil litigation is manifested as a standard,comprehensive and rational communication platform.Civil litigation mode in talks is the embodiment of the communicative rationality;Communicative rationality and discourse ethics put forward by Habermas happens to coincide with essential feature of modern litigation,and perhaps this kind of mode can yet be regarded as the route of the transformation of civil litigation mode in our country.

关 键 词：诉讼模式 交往合理性 商谈 共识 纠纷解决 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]