《刑法修正案(九)》第二十五条第三款的制度目的探讨——以“法益”概念的发展趋势为视角  

Discussion on the Institutional Aim of Part Three of Article Twenty-five in the Ninth Remedy of Criminal Law

作　　者：刘三洋[1] 朱孟超[1,2] Liu Sanyang;Zhu Mengchao(Institute of Law,Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang 212001,China;Office,People's Procuratorate in Yangzhong,Zhenjiang 212200,China)

机构地区：[1]江苏大学法学院,江苏镇江212001 [2]扬中市检察院办公室,江苏镇江212200

出　　处：《河北经贸大学学报（综合版）》2017年第3期34-37,88,共5页Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business(Comprehensive Edition)

基　　金：2016年度江苏省普通高校专业学位研究生实践创新计划项目(SJLX16_0419)

摘　　要：非法出售或提供试题、答案罪是本次刑法修订新增的内容之一,其在刑法学界受到冷遇,在现实社会却大量涌现。关于该罪名的制度目的,也即其保护何种法益的问题,存在"文化传统论"与"社会制度论"的分歧。在法益发展的客观化、个体化趋势下,以不特定个体的公平竞争权为基础的国家考试选拔机制,才是本罪的保护法益。维护这一机制,是本罪的制度目的。The actions of transferring or providing testing papers and answer illegal are one of added crimes in the ninth remedy of criminal law,which was lack of attention from scholars,yet emerged in a large number in society.Referring to the institutional aim,or else for what legal benefit the regulation protects,there exists divergence between two theory of the theory of"cultural tradition"and"theory of social system.In trend of objectification,individualized evolution development,on the basis of a particular individual's right to fair competition for the state examination selection mechanism,is the protection of benefit of this crime.To maintain this mechanism is the institution aim of crime system.

关 键 词：非法出售或提供试题、答案罪 法益 预防刑论 公平竞争权 考试制度 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]