1例单侧大腿截肢者穿戴四种假肢膝关节步行能力的评价  

Walking Ability of an Unilateral Transfemoral Amputee with Four Kinds of Prosthetic Knee Joints

作　　者：刁子龙 曹学军[2,3] 魏艳琴[2] 马鑫鑫[1] DIAO Zi-long;CAO Xue-jun;WEI Yan-qin;MA Xin-xin(Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China;Capital Medical University School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing 100068, China;Institute of Rehabilitation Engineering, China Rehabilitation Research Center, Beijing 100068, China)

机构地区：[1]首都医科大学附属北京康复医院,北京市100144 [2]首都医科大学康复医学院,北京市100068 [3]中国康复研究中心康复工程研究所,北京市100068

出　　处：《中国康复理论与实践》2017年第10期1216-1220,共5页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice

基　　金：中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目(No.2015CZ-19)

摘　　要：目的比较1例单侧大腿截肢者穿戴四种不同假肢膝关节后的步行能力,为临床开具假肢处方提供参考。方法 1例单侧大腿截肢者分别穿戴机械四连杆、气压四连杆、液压单轴和智能假肢膝关节,穿戴智能日常活动能量消耗记录仪进行计时起立与行走测试、室内6分钟步行测试、静态站立平衡测试和室外1000 m步行测试。结果截肢者穿戴智能膝关节假肢比穿戴其他膝关节假肢在步行过程中能量消耗少,步行速度快。结论不同假肢膝关节对单侧大腿截肢者步行能力影响不同。Objective To compare the walking abilities of an unilateral transfemoral amputee with four different prosthetic knee joints,to provide a reference for clinical prosthetic prescription.Methods An unilateral transfemoral amputee was asked to wear four kinds of prostheticknee joints,mechanical four-bar,pneumatic four-bar,hydraulic and intelligent prosthetic knee joints,and evaluated with Timed Upand Go Test,indoor6-Minute Walk Test,Static Stand Balance Test and a1000-meter Outdoor Walking Ability Test,wearing Intelligent Devicefor Energy Expenditure and Activity.Results The amputee consumed the least energy and walked the fastest with intelligent prostheticknee joint.Conclusion There are some difference in walking ability with different prosthetic knee joints.

关 键 词：大腿截肢者 假肢 步行能力 假肢膝关节 评定 

分 类 号：R496[医药卫生—康复医学]