论生态环境损害民事救济的局限性  

Limitations of Civil Remedies on Environmental Damage

作　　者：袁珊 贾爱玲 Yuan Shan;Jia Ailing(School of Law and Politics, Zhejiang A&F University, Lin'an Zhejiang 311300, China)

机构地区：[1]浙江农林大学法政学院,浙江临安311300

出　　处：《中国环境管理干部学院学报》2017年第5期7-10,共4页Journal of Environmental Management College of China

基　　金：国家社科基金课题<<侵权责任法>视角下生态利益损害的多元化救济研究>(FX:2014039)

摘　　要：近年来,我国生态环境问题日趋严重,不少专家学者对生态环境损害的救济进行了积极探索,也提出了不少意见。其中很大一部分人认为生态环境损害问题只要纳入到侵权法进行调整,就可以实现全面救济。然而侵权法的私法局限性、找不到具体侵犯的权利支撑及其民事救济预防性责任的不足,使得民事救济论这条道路走不通。实现生态环境损害的充分救济需要在多部门法配合的基础上,制定一部生态环境损害赔偿法。Nowadays,ecological and environmental problems have been getting worse and worse,as a result,lots of experts and scholars are trying their bests to give advice for the aim of relieving the environment damage.A large number of them think that civil law can provide abundant protect for the environment damage.However,the civil remedies can not come true because civil law has its limitations and we cannot find concrete right for the environment damage,and civil law do not have enough preventive remedies.If we want to relieve the environment damage,we have to constitute a law of the environment damage based on different departmental laws'cooperation.

关 键 词：生态环境损害 概念界定 民事救济 局限 生态环境损害赔偿法 

分 类 号：D922.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]