检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:施峥[1] 朱宏[1] SHI Zheng;ZHU Hong
机构地区:[1]浙江警察学院
出 处:《江苏警官学院学报》2017年第5期121-128,共8页Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute
基 金:浙江警察学院与浙江省宁海县公安局校局合作课题"李士珍警察教育思想及启示"(编号:2016XJY008)
摘 要:李士珍与戴笠是民国警察教育举足轻重的两个代表性人物。他们虽是浙江同乡与黄埔校友,却有着迥然不同的成长经历与性格特征。20世纪30年代初,他们于力行社的特务训练中初涉警察教育,并在其后争夺警察教育最高领导权的过程中形成了各自的教育主张。李士珍的"正规警察"教育与戴笠的"政治警察"教育在人才培养目标、教育方针、教育管理、教学内容与实践形式等方面,既有显著区别,亦存相似之处。比较研究二人的警察教育思想与实践,对于深入了解我国近代警察教育具有十分重要的理论和现实意义。Lee Shih-chen and Dai Li were two leading exponents of critical significance in police education during the period of the Republic of China.Both of them were from the same province of Zhejiang,and alumni of the Huangpu Military Academy,but they developed their career along totally different paths,and they were totally different from each other in personality features.In the early1930s,they got involved in the police education for the first time at the secret agent training institution.Afterwards,they developed their respective propositions of education during the process of competition for the supreme leadership of police education.There was prominent difference in the talent development objectives,general policies,administration,contents and the forms of practice between Lee Shih-chen’s education of normal police and Dai Li’s education of political police,though they were also somewhat similar with each other.The comparison of the ideas and practice of police education between the two of them is of fundamental theoretical and practical values in the insight into modern police education in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.205.74