检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:岳超 王怀义 滕松 娄平 罗萍 白建明[2,3] YUE Chao;WANG Huaiyi;TENG Song;LOU Ping;LUO Ping;BAI Jianming(Gejiu Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Gejiu, Yunnan 661000, China;Economic Crop Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650200, China;Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Potato and Rapeseed in Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, Ministry of Agriculture, Kunming, Yunnan 650200, China)
机构地区:[1]云南省个旧市农业技术推广中心,云南个旧661000 [2]云南省农业科学院经济作物研究所,云南昆明650200 [3]农业部云贵高原马铃薯与油菜科学观测实验站,云南昆明650200
出 处:《中国马铃薯》2017年第6期341-345,共5页Chinese Potato Journal
基 金:基金项目:云南省技术创新人才培养对象(2015HB002);国家马铃薯产业技术体系岗位科学家(CARS-10-P07);云南省现代农业马铃薯产业技术体系建设(2017KJTX003)
摘 要:为研究缓控释肥、生物有机肥对马铃薯的增产增收效果,以当地主推品种‘合作88’为试验材料,以当地农民习惯施肥为对照,研究了施用推荐施肥、缓控释肥和生物有机肥对马铃薯产量、产量构成因素和经济效益的影响。结果表明,马铃薯施用缓控释肥、生物有机肥对改善马铃薯产量构成因素不明显,但是可以明显提高产量和经济效益。产量增幅在7.88%~14.92%,其中处理4(施用推荐施肥减20%+生物有机肥80 kg/667m^2)的产量最高,较处理1(习惯施肥)增产428 kg/667m^2,达到3 297 kg/667m^2,增产14.92%;马铃薯经济效益增加幅度在1.73%~13.81%,其中处理4(推荐施肥减20%+生物有机肥)较处理1(习惯施肥)增加收益605元/667m^2;使用生物有机肥的经济效益要高于使用缓控释肥和常规肥料;建议在种植马铃薯时,可以适当减少化肥的使用量,增加生物有机肥的使用量,起到减肥增收的作用。A local potato variety'Hezuo88'was used to study the influence of slow-release fertilizer and bio-organic fertilizer on tuber yield,yield components and economic benefits in order to understand their effects in potato production.There was no significant difference on the yield components among slow-release fertilizer,bio-organic fertilizer and the traditional fertilizer used by local farmers(CK),but the tuber yield and economic benefits were significantly improved by using slow-release fertilizer and/or bio-organic fertilizer.The yield was increased in a range of7.88%to14.92%,while the economic benefit in a range of1.73%-13.81%.The Treatment4(20%decrease in recommended fertilization application combined with80kg/667m2bio-organic fertilizer)produced the highest yield of3297kg/667m2,which was428kg/667m2(14.92%)higher than that of the control,and the economic benefit of Treatment4was605Yuan/667m2higher than the control.The economic benefit of bio-organic fertilizer was higher than that of slow-release and traditional fertilizers.It is suggested that the amount of chemical fertilizer could be reduced appropriately,and the bio-organic fertilizer should be increased,which would play a role in reducing fertilizer and increasing income.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222