权力距离与社会腐败——基于跨国数据的实证研究  

Power distance and corruption:An empirical study based on transnational data

作　　者：饶育蕾[1] 何鲁 彭叠峰[1] 鲍玮[1] RAO Yulei;HE Lu;PENG Diefeng;BAO Wei(School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

机构地区：[1]中南大学商学院,湖南长沙410083

出　　处：《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第6期69-76,共8页Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目"移动互联网环境下农村普惠金融机制:基于社会互动的实验研究"(71673306);国家自然科学青年基金项目"基于内生性社会学习机制的股票市场参与决策研究"(71301169)

摘　　要：腐败问题是当前国际社会普遍面临的一大难题。利用全球62个国家和地区的"感知清廉"指数、Hofstede"权力距离"文化价值观维度和其他相关数据,对权力距离与腐败间关系进行实证研究。结果表明,权力距离对腐败程度存在显著的正向影响。使用两阶段最小二乘法解决内生性问题后,该结论仍然成立。进一步研究发现,权力距离主要是通过"社会监督"途径而非"资源集中"途径对腐败产生影响。这一结论为从权力距离角度深入理解腐败产生的文化根源提供了经验证据。Corruption is a severe problem currently facing the international community.Using the index of“perception corruption,”the cultural dimension of Hofstede’s“power distance”and other relevant data from62countries and regions,this empirical study finds that higher power distance will lead to greater degree of corruption.Using two-stage least squares method to solve the endogenous problem,conclusion still holds.Further investigation indicates that the impact of power distance on corruption is mainly through the“social supervision”rather than“resource concentration”approach.This study provides empirical evidence for better understanding of the cultural roots of corruption and taking appropriate measures against it.

关 键 词：社会腐败 权力距离 内生性 资源集中 社会监督 

分 类 号：C912.3[经济管理]