检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张拥军 王潇潇 王欢 林辉[3] 胡敏 ZHANG Yong-jun;WANG Xiao-xiao;WANG Huan;LIN Hui;HU Min(Department of Mathematics and Physics, School of Comprehensive Foundation Studies, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233000, Anhui, China;Visual Research Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, Anhui, China;Department of Physics, School of Electronic Science & Applied Physics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, Anhui, China)
机构地区:[1]蚌埠医学院公共基础学院数理教研室,蚌埠233000 [2]中国科学技术大学生命科学学院视觉研究实验室,合肥230027 [3]合肥工业大学电子科学与应用物理学院物理系,合肥230009
出 处:《第二军医大学学报》2017年第10期1321-1326,共6页Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University
基 金:国家自然科学基金委中-加国际合作项目(81261120562);安徽省自然科学基金(1408085MKL16);蚌埠医学院自然科学基金重点项目(BYKY1626ZD)~~
摘 要:目的设计一种新的视力检测方法——自适应视力检测法,探讨自适应视力检测法的实际应用价值。方法通过计算机仿真实验考察自适应视力检测法的可行性。以仿真实验为基础,分别用40trials、80trials的自适应视力检测法及标准对数视力表(随机次序)对30名受试者[(26.1±4.7)岁,男18名、女12名]进行双眼视力检查。用自适应视力检测法检查结果与标准对数视力表检查结果的一致性限度评价其准确性,用配对样本t检验评价两种检查方法的相关性和差异性。结果受试者的视力检查结果显示40trials的自适应视力检测法检查结果与标准对数视力表检查结果间差异无统计学意义,但80trials的自适应视力检测法检查结果与标准对数视力表检查结果间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在合理的检查次数内(40trials),自适应视力检测法与标准对数视力表在成人视力检查中一致性较好。与标准对数视力表相比,自适应视力检测法有避免视标记忆问题、减小视觉拥挤效应等优势,具有实际应用价值。ObjectiveTo design a new method for visual acuity test naming computerized tumbling E test,and to explore the application of computerized tumbling E test.MethodsThe feasibility of computerized tumbling E test was investigated by computer simulation experiment.Based on the simulation experiment,a total of30subjects([26.1±4.7]years old,18males and12females)received binocular vision acuity examination by computerized tumbling E test with40trials or80trials and standard logarithmic visual acuity chart(random sequence),respectively.The accuracy of computerized tumbling E test was evaluated by comparing the consistency limit with standard logarithmic visual acuity chart.The correlation and difference between the two tests were evaluated by paired samples t test.ResultsThere was no significant difference between the results of the computerized tumbling E test with40trials and standard logarithmic visual acuity chart,while the difference between the results of the80trials and standard logarithmic visual acuity chart was statistically significant(P<0.05).ConclusionThe consistency is good for adult visual test using the computerized tumbling E test with reasonable number of trials(40trials)and the standard logarithmic visual acuity chart.Compared with the standard logarithmic visual acuity chart,computerized tumbling E test has advantages such as avoiding the problem of optotype memory and reducing the visual crowding effect,showing practical application value(P<0.05).
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30