检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:连凡[1] LIAN Fan(School of Philosophy, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China 430072)
出 处:《温州大学学报(社会科学版)》2018年第2期66-73,共8页Journal of Wenzhou University:Social Science Edition
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(16JJD720014)
摘 要:《宋元学案》编纂者明确了永嘉学派分两个支流,源头都是二程洛学,一支以叶适为代表,一支以薛季宣、陈傅良为代表。黄宗羲肯定了永嘉之学倡导经世致用是为了纠正道学末流的空疏弊病,同时指出事功之学的流弊有陷入刑名之学的危险。全祖望指出永嘉之学虽以礼乐制度为主而追求体现于事功之中,但也兼顾主敬涵养,至叶适将内圣道德作为外王事功之根本,从而修正了薛季宣、陈傅良等重事功轻内圣的偏向。黄宗羲从道德与事功并重的立场出发,调和了永康学派代表人物陈亮与朱熹的义利之辩。全祖望以陈亮晚年迎合光宗博取功名为例对其之人品节操提出非议。对于永嘉学派的同调唐仲友,全祖望肯定其经制之学的学术地位,并认为朱熹、唐仲友的交恶应该平摊责任。It is clear and definite via the compiler that Yongjia School is classified into two categories,their source comes from Luo School headed by Cheng brothers,one is represented by Ye Shi and another is represented by Xue Jixuan as well as Chen Fuliang.Mr.Huang Zongxi confirms that the purpose of innovative applications on reality initiated by Yongjia School is to correct the fraud of empty and shallow from the decadent Taoist school.And he also points out that the fraud of learning about deeds falls into the risks of legalist school.Mr.Quan Zuwang,another scholar aty that time points out that Yongjia school mainly seek to ritual and music institutions embodied inside the practice and also takes account of respect and cultivation.Until Mr.Ye Shi revises the deviation of pragmatics and non-internal saint from Xue Jixuan and Chen Fuliang via his putting inner sage morality as root of external domain contribution.Mr.Huang Zongxi mediates the debate over justice and benefit between Chen Liang and Zhu Xi of Yongkang school from the position of attaching equal importance to inner morality and outer contribution.While Mr.Quan Zuwang illustrated Chen Liang’s misdeed of catering to Guang Zong to gain fame and put forward the criticism to Chen Liang’s character moral integrity.As for Mr.Tang Zhongyou with the same inclination of East Zhejiang School,Mr.Quan Zuwang affirms the historical position of his philosophy and considers that split of Zhu Xi and Tang Zhongyou is supposed to share the responsibility.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.129.89.50