检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马春娟[1] 姚晓晓[1] MA Chun-juan;YAO Xiao-xiao(Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
出 处:《哈尔滨学院学报》2018年第3期61-64,共4页Journal of Harbin University
摘 要:羁押不是独立的刑事强制措施,它是逮捕后的必然结果,具有预支刑罚的性质,而且有悖于无罪推定这一基本原则。长期以来,高羁押率在我国司法实践中备受诟病。为限制羁押适用范围,不仅应当在羁押开始之初设置实体性和程序性障碍条件,在决定采取羁押措施后还应当对羁押必要性进行定期复查,将其纳入动态考察机制,严防不当羁押、超期羁押。文章以羁押必要性审查为研究对象,立足于我国羁押必要性审查的现实状况,深入分析问题产生原因并提出可行性建议,对进一步加强我国羁押必要性审查制度中的人权保障具有重要意义。Taking into custody is not a criminal compulsory measurement for independent criminal cases.It is the inevitable result for arresting.Since it has the nature of pre-penalty it is against the basic principle of innocence assumption.For long time,the high custody rate has been criticized in Chinese judicial practice.To limit the applicable scope of custody,the procedural obstacles should not be set up at the early stage of custody.There should be regular review for the necessity of taking into custody,which should be included in the system of dynamic inspection mechanism to prevent inappropriate custody.Based on the survey of current status,the causes are analyzed with suggestions for feasibility.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222