检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李志强[1] LI Zhiqiang(Key Laboratory of Highway Construction&Maintenance Technology in Loess Region,Shanxi Transportation Research Institute,Taiyuan 030006,Shanxi,China)
机构地区:[1]山西省交通科学研究院黄土地区公路建设与养护技术交通行业重点实验室,山西太原030006
出 处:《筑路机械与施工机械化》2018年第1期111-115,共5页Road Machinery & Construction Mechanization
基 金:山西省交通建设科技项目(2012-1-8)
摘 要:为了研究路面抗滑性能测试方法的适用性,有效地评价沥青路面抗滑性能,结合实体路段检测,采用横向力系数测试方法和激光构造深度测试方法分别进行测试,比较两种方法的适用性和优劣;通过研究成果调查及实体道路测试数据分析,对横向力系数和构造深度的相关性进行了探讨。结果表明:横向力系数和构造深度均可以准确地评价路面抗滑性能,但应用范围有所差异;两者在特定条件下具有一定的相关性。In order to study the suitability of the test methods for skid resistance of pavement and make effective evaluation,the investigation on road section was conducted by measuring sideway-force coefficient and texture depth respectively,and the pros and cons of each test method were pointed out.The correlation between sideway-force coefficient and texture depth was discussed based on the indoor test and the measured data.The results show that despite the difference in the range of application,both the sideway-force coefficient and texture depth can accurately evaluate the skid resistance performance of pavement;there is no significant correlation between the two,which merely shows under particular conditions.
分 类 号:U416.217[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229