检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李晓静[1] 艾兴政[1] 唐小我[1] LI Xiao-jing;AI Xing-zheng;TANG Xiao-wo(School of Management,University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,Chengdu 610054,China)
机构地区:[1]电子科技大学经济与管理学院,四川成都610054
出 处:《管理工程学报》2018年第2期151-158,共8页Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71372140);国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(71432003);国家自然科学基金青年科学资助项目(71402101);四川省学术和技术带头人培养项目(23601027)
摘 要:基于竞争供应链市场,以供应商,制造商和零售商组成的三级供应链模型为基准,考察了创新驱动下三级供应链的纵向整合策略与两条链竞争对制造商利润的影响,并识别出每种整合策略选择的条件及其均衡特征。同时,从社会效益和消费者角度讨论了最优整合策略。研究发现:当一个制造商不进行整合时,另一个制造商对前向一体化的选择主要取决于两条链的竞争强度,对后向一体的选择严重依赖于创新投资成本系数。这显著不同于,两种整合策略的选择(即前向一体化和后向一体化)只依赖于创新投资成本系数。同时,制造商整合策略选择的动态过程不仅与创新投资成本系数相关,还受到两条链间竞争强度的影响,且两条链竞争程度不强时,若创新投资成本系数较小,则向后一体化策略为最终的占优均衡;若创新投资成本系数较大,则向前一体化策略为最终的占优均衡;若两条链竞争与创新投资成本系数都非常高时,分散化策略为最终的占优均衡策略。We investigate vertical integration of two competing supply chains,each consisting of a manufacturer,a supplier,and a retailer.The supplier offers components to its manufacturers and make effort to lower cost through R&D motivation.The manufacturer is engaged in product manufacturing.The retailer orders products from manufacturer and resell products to market.More prior papers focus on the two-tier supply chain and discuss only the forward integration for manufacturers.Different from them,we analyze strategic behaviors of supply chain players in a three-tier supply chain and consider that each manufacturer has one of the three strategies to choose:decentralization,forward integration,or backward integration.Therefore,there are six possible configurations:NN,SS,RR,SN,RN,SR.where N denotes no integration,S denotes backward integration,and R denotes forward integration.We study the effect of vertical integration on cost,product price,and profitability,and identify a subgame perfect Nash Equilibrium of the competing supply chains.We find that:(i)When one of manufacturers is not vertically integrated,the other manufacturers’forward integration strategy mainly depends on the intensity of competition between the two chains.Backward integration strategy relies heavily on innovation investment cost coefficient.In addition,two kinds of integration choice(i.e.,forward integration and backward integration)only depend on the innovation investment cost coefficient.(ii)When one of manufacturers chooses forward integration or backward integration,the integration strategy is more valuable to the other manufacturers than no integration strategy.For two kinds of integration choice,if innovation investment cost coefficient is low,the other manufacturers prefers backward integration strategy.If the innovation investment cost coefficient is high,the other manufacturers prefer forward integration strategy.(iii)In addition,the dynamic integration process of manufacturers is not only related with the innovation of investment cost coeff
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145