检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马艳 顾瑜 陈尚[4] 董海鹰 Ma Yan;Gu Yu;Chen Shang;Dong Haiying(Qingdao Engineering Technology Research Center of Meteorological Disaster Prevention,Qingdao 266003,China;Qingdao Meteorological Office,Qingdao 266003,China;Ocean University of China,Qingdao 266100,China;The First Institute of Oceanography,State Oceanic Administration,Qingdao 266061,China)
机构地区:[1]青岛市气象灾害防御工程技术研究中心,山东青岛266003 [2]青岛市气象局,山东青岛266003 [3]中国海洋大学,山东青岛266100 [4]国家海洋局第一海洋研究所,山东青岛266061
出 处:《气象与环境科学》2017年第4期19-26,共8页Meteorological and Environmental Sciences
基 金:山东省自然科学基金(ZR2012DM008);青岛市气象局科技创新基金(2014qdqxc01);山东省气象科学研究所数值天气预报应用技术开放研究基金(SDQXKF2014Z04)资助
摘 要:1~10 km水平分辨率是中尺度模式是否采用积云对流参数化方案的"灰色带"。基于青岛市气象局9 km分辨率WRF模式,分别选择KF、GD和BMJ三种积云对流参数化方案对青岛5次大范围降雨过程进行预报试验,分析比较不同积云对流参数化方案对青岛地区降水预报效果的影响。结果表明,这三种积云对流参数化方案对不同量级的降雨具有不同的预报性能:BMJ对小雨预报性能最佳;没有考虑积云对流参数化过程的控制试验对中雨的预报效果最好,KF方案次之;GD方案对大雨和暴雨预报效果均较好。对稳定性降水,GD方案对沿海站点降雨量预报效果较好,KF方案则对内陆站点预报性能较好;对对流性降水,BMJ方案无论是在沿海站点还是在内陆站点都有比较好的预报效果。在降雨空间分布上,对稳定性降水过程,各试验方案均模拟出了小于50 mm的降雨区,对大于100 mm强降雨区,GD方案具有较好的预报效果;对对流性降水过程,BMJ方案预报效果整体较好。Horizontal resolution of 1 10 km is a“gray belt”for weather or not to use the cumulus convective parameterization scheme in the mesoscale model.Five rainfall events in Qingdao are simulated using WRF model of horizontal resolution 9 km in Qingdao Meteorological Office with 3 cumulus convective parameterization schemes KF,GD and BMJ respectively,and the impact of different cumulus parameterization schemes on the forecast ability of rainfall in Qingdao is analyzed.The results showed that the 3 cumulus convective parameterization schemes had different forecast ability on different rainfall levels.BMJ did best for light rain,non-convective parameterization scheme did the best job for moderate rain and KF scheme took the second place.GD scheme was good for heavy rain and torrential rain.GD scheme performed well on the coastal stations and KF shown good performance on inland stations for the case of stability rainfall process.For convective rainfall process,BMJ did best no matter on coastal or inland stations.In the rainfall distribution,all schemes could simulate rainfall areas less than 50 mm in the case of stability rainfall process,and GD scheme did better for the rainfall areas more than 100 mm.In general,BMJ performed better in the case of convective rainfall process.
分 类 号:P468.0[天文地球—大气科学及气象学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200