检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁晓娇[1] 陈秋燕[1] 程科[1] 吉木哈学[1] YUAN Xiao-jiao;CHEN Qiu-yan;CHENG Ke;Jimu Haxue(School of Sociology and Psychology,Southwest Minzu University,Chengdu 610041,China)
机构地区:[1]西南民族大学社会学与心理学学院,四川成都610041
出 处:《民族高等教育研究》2018年第1期81-86,共6页Research on Higher Education of Nationalities
基 金:西南民族大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目"少数民族大学生的文化适应过程及影响因素研究"(项目编号:2017SZYQN79)的研究成果
摘 要:通过揭示不同民族大学生人格特征和幸福感的特点,以及不同民族大学生人格特征与幸福感间的关系,为民族高校心理健康工作提供教育对策。采用艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)和总体幸福感量表(GWB)对某民族高校的6036名汉族和少数民族大学生进行测查。结果表明,幸福感在大学生群体中具有民族差异,少数民族女生的幸福感显著低于汉族女生;外倾性和精神质人格具有跨民族的一致性,神经质人格方面汉族男女学生间无显著差异,但少数民族女生的神经质水平显著高于少数民族男生;外倾性人格对幸福感有正向预测作用,神经质和精神质人格特征对幸福感有负向预测作用,其中神经质人格特征的预测作用最强,且在少数民族大学生群体中神经质人格特征的预测作用强于汉族大学生。The current study aimed to explore characteristics and the relationship between personality and well-being among college students of different nationalities.This study investigated 6036 college students of different nationalities using Eysenck Personality of Adult(EPQ)and General Well-Being Schedule(GWB).Results showed that subject well-being had significant racial differences among college students.Female minority students’well-being was significantly lower than female Han students.Extroversion and psychoticism were consistent across different nationalities;in terms of neuroticism,there was no gender difference among Han students,while female minority students’neuroticism was significantly higher than female Han students.Extroversion had positive effect on well-being,while neuroticism and psychoticism had negative effect on well-being.Neuroticism had the strongest predictive power among all dimensions of personality,and it had stronger effect among minority students than Han students.
分 类 号:B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.60