检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张文胜[1] ZHANG Wen-sheng(Anhui Police Officer Vocational College,Hefei,Anhui 230031)
出 处:《阜阳职业技术学院学报》2018年第1期87-91,共5页Journal of Fuyang Institute of Technology
基 金:安徽警官职业学院人文社会科学研究重点项目(rwsk201602)
摘 要:现行体制下的审执分离实指执行裁决权和执行实施权分离,审执分离的路径选择不仅要考量审执分离的目标、改革的成本和域外的经验,更是要厘清执行权的本质,合理界定审判权与执行权的边界。根据我国国家权力配置的实际和国情,结合执行权本质属性,深化内分则是我国现行审执分离的最佳路径选择。The judgment-and-execution separation under the current system means the separation of the enforcement implementing power and the enforcement judging power,path selection of the judgment-and-execution separation should not only consider the goals,reform costs and foreign experiences,but also clarify the essence of the executive power and rationally define the boundaries between the judicial power and the executive power.Based on the reality of our national power allocation,China's actual conditions,and the nature of executive power,deepening the internal points is the best way to separate the current trial and adjudication.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.147.211