“大司法”视野下我国审执分离的路径选择——以民事执行权为解释背景  

Path Selection of the Judgment-and-Execution Separation from the Perspective of “The large administration of justice”——taking civil executive power as the explanation background

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:张文胜[1] ZHANG Wen-sheng(Anhui Police Officer Vocational College,Hefei,Anhui 230031)

机构地区:[1]安徽警官职业学院,安徽合肥230031

出  处:《阜阳职业技术学院学报》2018年第1期87-91,共5页Journal of Fuyang Institute of Technology

基  金:安徽警官职业学院人文社会科学研究重点项目(rwsk201602)

摘  要:现行体制下的审执分离实指执行裁决权和执行实施权分离,审执分离的路径选择不仅要考量审执分离的目标、改革的成本和域外的经验,更是要厘清执行权的本质,合理界定审判权与执行权的边界。根据我国国家权力配置的实际和国情,结合执行权本质属性,深化内分则是我国现行审执分离的最佳路径选择。The judgment-and-execution separation under the current system means the separation of the enforcement implementing power and the enforcement judging power,path selection of the judgment-and-execution separation should not only consider the goals,reform costs and foreign experiences,but also clarify the essence of the executive power and rationally define the boundaries between the judicial power and the executive power.Based on the reality of our national power allocation,China's actual conditions,and the nature of executive power,deepening the internal points is the best way to separate the current trial and adjudication.

关 键 词:审判权 民事执行权 执行裁决权 执行实施权 司法改革 

分 类 号:D926[政治法律—法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象