检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:施豪杰[1] SHI Hao-jie(Huaian city Huaiyin Hospital Thoracic surgery,Jiangsu Huaian 223300,China)
出 处:《临床医药文献电子杂志》2017年第100期19614-19615,共2页Electronic Journal of Clinical Medical Literature
摘 要:目的探究胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术与传统食管癌根治术治疗同期40例患者的临床效果。方法本次选取食管癌患者40例作为研究对象,收治时间2016年1月~2017年12月,分为两组,对照组给予传统食管癌根治术治疗(20例)、观察组给予胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术治疗(20例)。结果两组食管癌患者在手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、首次排气时间对比中存在明显差异,P值小于0.05。两组食管癌患者在并发症发生率对比中存在明显差异,P值小于0.05。结论胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术的临床效果优于传统食管癌根治术的临床效果,且具有创伤小、出血量少、恢复快、疼痛轻等优势,临床上值得应用及推广。Objective To investigate the clinical effect of thoracic-laparoscopic combined esophageal cancer radical resection and conventional esophagectomy for the treatment of 40 patients in the same period.Methods Forty patients with esophageal cancer were enrolled in this study.The patients were divided into two groups from January 2016 to December 2017.The control group was given conventional esophageal cancer radical mastectomy(20 cases).The observation group was given thoracic and abdominal cavity Mirror combined with radical resection of esophageal cancer(20 cases).Results There was a significant difference between the two groups in esophageal cancer operation time,intraoperative blood loss,hospitalization time,the first time of exhaust time,P value less than 0.05.Two groups of esophageal cancer patients in the incidence of complications there is a significant difference,P value of less than 0.05.Conclusion The clinical effect of thoraco-laparoscopic combined with esophagectomy is superior to the traditional gastrectomy for esophageal cancer.It has the advantages of less trauma,less bleeding,faster recovery and less pain.It is worthy of clinical application and promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.12.160.196