“棘津”地望考辨——从《史记》注解一则说起  

Examinations of the Geographical Location of “Jijin”——Speaking of a Note of Historical Records

作　　者：王少帅[1] Wang Shaoshuai

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学文学院

出　　处：《中国地方志》2018年第2期111-115,128,共6页China Local Records

摘　　要："棘津"之地名常见于典籍,但多有争论,莫衷一是。《史记·游侠列传》中对棘津之地的《集解》《正义》注释虽名同而实异。徐广之"广川之棘津"与张守节之"异称石济津、南津的棘津"并非一处,大有郢书燕说之误。而关于棘津之地的位置考证以及与其他地理位置的关系,也牵涉对《左传》等典籍文献的理解。加之最近考证该地之新说渐出,然尚需探讨。将甲骨卜辞记载与传世文本记载相结合,尚有可考证的空间。所以,棘津渡口异称"石济津""南津"与"棘津城"并非一地,而"棘津"也并非"孟津"之所在。The place name“Jijin”often appears in classic works,but causes considerable controversies.The notes of Jijin in the Collected Biographies of Roving Knights of Historical Records are different in Collected Annotations and Proper Definitions,though bearing the same place name.Xu Guang s“Jijin of Guangchuan”is not the same as Zhang Shoujie s“the Jijin also called Shijijin or Nanjin”,and the notes are rather strained and far fetched.Examinations of the location of Jijin and its relations with other geographical locations also affect understandings of other classic works such as Zuo Zhuan.Recently,new explanations of that place name gradually emerged,but there is still room for discussion.Combining oracle inscriptions recordings with inherited textual recordings,we still see room for further investigation.Therefore,Jijin the ferry-place also called“Shijijin”and“Nanjin”is not the same as“Jijin city”,and“Jijin”is not where“Mengjin”is.

关 键 词：棘津 孟津 《史记》 《左传》 

分 类 号：K204.2[历史地理—历史学]