检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李红海[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院
出 处:《中外法学》2018年第2期493-511,共19页Peking University Law Journal
摘 要:案例指导制度已在司法实践中运行有时,并取得了一定成效,只是如何继续推进颇令人踌躇。"国家治理能力"概念的提出,为案例指导制度下一步的发展提供了新的思路:即指导性案例的"指导性"不应仅限于确立司法政策或解释法律,并由此指导法官同案同判;还应鼓励和引导法官参照指导性案例中的说理模式在疑难案件中进行判决书说理,并总结出相应的裁判要点以形成规则。这样一方面可以提高法官的司法水平和整体的司法治理能力,实现司法公正,另一方面也可以推进法律的发展。The guiding cases system has been running for several years and has got some achieve-ments,but it is not clear how it can improve.The concept of^ability of state governance”provides a new approach for this.This article holds that^guiding”does not only mean to direct judges to make similar decision with their predecessors,it also means to provide a model for judges about how to develop legal reasoning in their judgments.Therefore,it is possible and also necessary to connect the writing of judg-ment with the advancement of the guiding cases system.Only by requiring judges to develop full legal reasoning in judgments and even to form more concrete rules for instant cases like guiding cases judges did,can the capacity of the whole judiciary be improved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.157