检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张永丽[1,2] 李青原 张河森 Yongli Zhang;Qingyuan Li(Precise Poverty Reduction and Regional Development Research Center,Northwest Normal University,Lanzhou,Gansu,730070;School of Business,Northwest Normal University,Lanzhou,Gansu,730070)
机构地区:[1]西北师范大学精准扶贫与区域发展研究中心,兰州730070 [2]西北师范大学商学院,兰州730070 [3]不详
出 处:《教育与经济》2018年第3期65-74,共10页Education & Economy
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目“人口转变、结构转型与反贫困战略调整研究”(编号:71541043)。
摘 要:根据甘肃省14个贫困村的入户调查数据,本文从劳动力受教育水平、收入结构、健康状况和家庭资源禀赋等方面对贫困与非贫困家庭的特征进行了比较,并在考虑内生性的基础上,运用工具变量法测算了贫困与非贫困家庭的教育收益率。估计结果显示:在纠正了内生性偏差后,贫困与非贫困家庭教育收益率均有所提高,贫困家庭教育收益率显著低于非贫困家庭。进一步分析认为,导致这一差异的原因主要和家庭负担、家庭资本有关。Based on the survey data which collected from 14 poverty villages in Gansu province,this paper compared poor families with non-poor families in terms of education level of labor force,income structure,health condition,and family resource endowment.Then,estimating the returns to education for poor and non-poor families by using instrumental variable method,while considering the problem of endogenous.The estimated results show that after correcting endogenous bias,the returns to education of both poor and non-poor families increase,while that of poor families is significantly lower than non-poor families.Further analysis suggests that the reasons leading to this difference are mainly related to the family burden constraints and family capital.
分 类 号:F08[经济管理—政治经济学] G40-054[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.193