IRoot BP Plus和MTA两种材料用于年轻恒牙活髓切断术的临床比较  

Clinical comparison of two materials IRoot BP Plus and MTA for pulmo amputation of young permanent teeth

作　　者：梁秋娟[1] 肖朋[2] 古力巴哈.买买提力 LIANG Qiu-juan;XIAO Peng;GULIBAHA·Maiaitili(Department of stomatology,the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Xinjiang Urumqi 830011,China;Department of stomatology,the second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Xinjiang Urumqi 830011,China)

机构地区：[1]新疆医科大学第五附属医院口腔科,新疆乌鲁木齐830011 [2]新疆医科大学第二附属医院口腔科,新疆乌鲁木齐830011

出　　处：《全科口腔医学电子杂志》2018年第18期8-9,共2页Electronic Journal of General Stomatology

摘　　要：目的比较IRoot BP Plus和MTA两种材料用于年轻恒牙活髓切断术的临床效果。方法选择符合纳入标准的年轻恒牙160颗,采用半随机方法分为两组,采用两种不同材料行活髓切断术。结果术后3个月IRoot BP Plus组成功率为98.8%,MTA组成功率为100%,两组成功率差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。术后6个月IRoot BP Plus组成功率为98.8%;MTA组成功率为100%,两组成功率差异无统计学意义(=0.160,P=0.689)。结论 IRoot BP Plus和MTA两种材料用于年轻恒牙活髓切断术成功率均较高无统计学差异,均适合做年轻恒牙的保存活髓治疗。Objective To compare two kinds of materials of IRoot BP Plus and MTA for pulmo amputation of young permanent teeth Clinical effect.Methods 160 young permanent teeth that met the inclusion criteria were selected and divided into two groups by semi randomized method.Two different materials were used for pulpiotomy.Results At 3 months after operation,the constituent power of IRoot BP Plus was 98.8%,and the success rate of MTA group was 100%.There was no significant difference in the success rate between the two groups(P=1.000).At 6 months after operation,the constituent power of IRoot BP Plus was 98.8%,the success rate of MTA group was 100%,and there was no significant difference in success rate between the two groups(=0.160,P=0.689).Conclusion The two materials of IRoot BP Plus and MTA have no significant difference in the success rate of young permanent teeth,which are suitable for the preservation of young permanent teeth.

关 键 词：年轻恒牙 活髓切断术 

分 类 号：R781.3[医药卫生—口腔医学]