检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐宁[1] 董剑宏[1] XU Ning;DONG Jian-Hong(Department of Minimal Invasive Digestive Surgery,Tumor Hospital,Shanxi Medical University,Taiyuan 030001,China)
机构地区:[1]山西医科大学附属肿瘤医院消化微创外科中心,太原030001
出 处:《中华老年多器官疾病杂志》2018年第7期557-560,共4页Chinese Journal of Multiple Organ Diseases in the Elderly
摘 要:Siewert Ⅱ/Ⅲ型食管胃结合部腺癌(AEG)早癌诊治率逐年升高,近端胃切除是各指南推荐的最佳切除范围。但早期采用的食管残胃吻合方式重建后反流性食管炎(RE)发生率较高,严重影响患者手术后生活质量,因此衍生出多种重建方式来解决这一问题。然而各种方式均有其优缺点,而哪种重建方式最佳目前尚存较大争议。本文就近端胃切除后消化道重建的历史演变及目前各种方式存在的争议作一梳理。In recent years,there were more and more Siewert typeⅡandⅢadenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction(AEG)diagnosed and treated at early stage,and proximal gastrectomy is an optional excision range recommended by various guidelines.But esophagogastrostomy used in early reconstruction causes quite higher incidence of reflux esophagitis(RE),which seriously affect the quality of life in these patients.Therefore,multiple procedures were derived to solve this problem.However,all these procedures have their own advantages and disadvantages,and there is still controversies about which one is the best.In this paper,we reviewed the historical evolution of digestive reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy and the existing controversies of various procedures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3