两种方法治疗牙槽突骨折的临床疗效比较  

Comparison of the Two Methods in the Treatment of Alveolar Fracture

作　　者：郑军[1] 孙凤林 母东亮 张型旺 杜玉芳[1] 刘丽佳[1] ZHENG Jun;SUN Fenglin;MU Dongliang;ZHANG Xingwang;DU Yufang;LIU Lijia(Department of Stomatology,Daqing Longnan Hospital,Daqing Heilongjiang 163411,China)

机构地区：[1]大庆龙南医院口腔科,黑龙江大庆163411

出　　处：《中国卫生标准管理》2018年第15期59-60,共2页China Health Standard Management

摘　　要：目的研究分析牙槽突骨折使用口腔正畸固定矫治术和牙弓夹板两种治疗方式的效果。方法我院对牙槽突骨折患者84例开展分析研究,将患者分成对照组和研究组。研究组使用托槽钢丝固定,对照组使用牙弓夹板法固定。结果研究组接受矫正治疗的优良率是90.48%,对照组的矫正治疗优良率是66.67%,两组的治疗优良率对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);两组在治疗前的牙龈出血倾向均比较低,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组牙龈出血情况差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论牙槽突骨折使用口腔正畸固定矫治技术治疗的效果突出,固定效果好,对牙周刺激小。Objective To study and analyze the effects of two orthodontic fixed orthodontic appliances and dental arch splint on alveolar fracture.Methods 84 patients with alveolar fracture were analyzed and divided into control group and research group.The study group was fixed with brackets wire and the control group was fixed with dental arch splint.Results The excellent rate of the study group for corrective therapy was 90.48%,the good rate of correction treatment in the control group was 66.67%,and there was a statistical difference between the two groups(P<0.01);The bleeding tendency of the two groups before treatment was relatively low,and the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).After treatment,there was a significant difference in bleeding between the two groups(P<0.01).Conclusion The treatment of alveolar fracture with orthodontic treatment is very effective,the fixation effect is good,the periodontal stimulation is small.

关 键 词：牙槽突骨折 固定矫治 牙弓夹板 临床疗效 牙龈出血 疗效比较 

分 类 号：R783[医药卫生—口腔医学]