机构地区:[1]Geological Survey of Western Australia,Mineral House,100 Plain Street,East Perth,Western Australia,6004,Australia [2]Centre for Exploration Targeting-Curtin Node,The Institute for Geoscience Research,Department of Applied Geology,Western Australian School of Mines,Curtin University,Perth,Western Australia,6102,Australia [3]John de Laeter Centre,The Institute for Geoscience Research,Department of Applied Geology and Applied Physics,Curtin University,Perth,Western Australia,6102,Australia
出 处:《Geoscience Frontiers》2018年第5期1515-1527,共13页地学前缘(英文版)
基 金:funded via an Australian Geophysical Observing System grant provided to Au Scope Pty Ltd.;the AQ44 Australian Education Investment Fund program;partly funded by the Western Australian Exploration Incentive Scheme
摘 要:Detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology has become the gold standard in evaluating source to sink relationships in sedimentary basins. However, the physical and chemical robustness of zircon, which make it such a useful mineral for provenance studies, is also a hindrance as zircon can be recycled through numerous sedimentary basins, thus obscuring the first cycle source to sink relationship. An elegant approach to addressing this potential issue is to compare the Pb isotope composition of detrital K-feldspar, a mineral which is unlikely to survive more than one erosion-transport-deposition cycle, with that of magmatic K-feldspar from potential basement source terranes. Here we present new in situ Pb isotope data on detrital K-feldspar from two Proterozoic arkosic sandstones from Western Australia, and magmatic K-feldspar grains from potential igneous source rocks, as inferred by the age and Hf isotope composition of detrital zircon grains. The data indicate that the detrital zircon and K-feldspar grains could not have been liberated from the same source rocks, and that the zircon has most likely been recycled through older sedimentary basins. These results provide a more complete understanding of apparently simple source to sink relationships in this part of Proterozoic Western Australia.Detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology has become the gold standard in evaluating source to sink relationships in sedimentary basins. However, the physical and chemical robustness of zircon, which make it such a useful mineral for provenance studies, is also a hindrance as zircon can be recycled through numerous sedimentary basins, thus obscuring the first cycle source to sink relationship. An elegant approach to addressing this potential issue is to compare the Pb isotope composition of detrital K-feldspar, a mineral which is unlikely to survive more than one erosion-transport-deposition cycle, with that of magmatic K-feldspar from potential basement source terranes. Here we present new in situ Pb isotope data on detrital K-feldspar from two Proterozoic arkosic sandstones from Western Australia, and magmatic K-feldspar grains from potential igneous source rocks, as inferred by the age and Hf isotope composition of detrital zircon grains. The data indicate that the detrital zircon and K-feldspar grains could not have been liberated from the same source rocks, and that the zircon has most likely been recycled through older sedimentary basins. These results provide a more complete understanding of apparently simple source to sink relationships in this part of Proterozoic Western Australia.
关 键 词:DETRITAL ZIRCON K-FELDSPAR Pb isotopes SEDIMENT PROVENANCE SEDIMENT RECYCLING
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...