旧志辨伪方法论——以甘肃、宁夏旧志为中心  

Old Local Records Authentification Methodology-A Case Study of Gansu and Ningxia Old Local Records

作　　者：韩中慧 Han Zhonghui

机构地区：[1]宁夏大学文学院

出　　处：《中国地方志》2018年第4期37-45,124,125,共11页China Local Records

基　　金：2012年度国家社科基金重点项目"宁夏地方文献整理与研究"(项目编号:12AZD081)阶段性成果

摘　　要：在对旧志进行整理与研究时,有时需要对其真伪进行辨明。可以说,辨伪是旧志整理过程不可或缺的环节。旧志在编纂和流传过程中,会形成部分伪志。伪志现象主要分为两大类:一类是旧志原书作伪,一类是旧志影印本作伪。前者系旧志编纂者所为,后者则系旧志出版者所为,两者的作伪动机、作伪手法不同。甘肃、宁夏两地个别旧志的作伪情况在一定程度上具有代表性。旧志辨伪,需要以传统辨伪学理论与方法为基础,再结合旧志自身的编纂体例,从古今目录著录的对比再到序跋、内容、体例等方面进行考察,揭示出作伪痕迹,并合理认识伪志的文献价值,以期为全国其他各省、自治区、直辖市旧志整理者提供思路和经验。During sorting and researching old local records,it is sometimes necessary to ascertain their authenticity.It could be said that authentification is an indispensable link in the sorting process of old local records.In the process of compilation and circulation,some falsified old local records may appear.The falsification phenomenon can be divided into two major categories,falsification of original old local records,and falsification of photocopied old local records.The former was done by the compiler,while the latter was done by the publisher,with different motivations and methods.The falsification of some old local records of Ningxia and Gansu is representative to a certain extent.To ascertain the authenticity of old local records,we need traditional authentification theories and methods as foundation,in combination with the compilation styles of old local records,so as to compare ancient and contemporary catalogues and writings,conduct investigation on aspects such as prefaces and afterwords,contents,and styles,reveal traces of falsification,and rationally understand the literature value of falsified local records.By doing so,we hope to provide approaches and experiences for sorters of old local records in other provinces,autonomous regions,and municipalities in the direct administration of the central government.

关 键 词：旧志 辨伪 方法论 文献价值 

分 类 号：K29[历史地理—历史学]