青年黑格尔派的解体:四个叙述框架  

Four Discourse Frames on the Collapse of the Young Hegelian School

作　　者：吴猛[1,2] Wu Meng

机构地区：[1]复旦大学哲学学院 [2]复旦大学当代国外马克思主义研究中心

出　　处：《世界哲学》2018年第5期46-55,160,共11页World Philosophy

摘　　要：关于青年黑格尔派的解体,在思想史上有三种叙述框架,分别由恩格斯、麦克莱伦和哈贝马斯提出。这三种叙述框架各有其优点,但也各有局限性,这种局限性主要体现在,三者在某种程度上都认为青年黑格尔派不具有真正的独立性。但通过对于青年黑格尔派的基本问题域的分析,我们可以给出第四个叙述框架,从这一框架看,青年黑格尔派是一个既不依附于黑格尔思想、也并非只是作为黑格尔哲学和马克思哲学之间的"过渡"和"中介"的独立的思想运动,而其解体正是这种独立性本身的体现。There were three discourse frames about the collapse of Young Hegelian School,which were put forward separately by Friedrich Engels,David McLellan and Jügen Habermas.These discourse frames are respectively effective on some certain range,but all have limitations in the sense of understanding this school as fully dependent on Hegel s philosophical system and was only a media of the transition from Hegel to Marx.But after examining its basic“problems”,we can find that the Young Hegelian School is a relatively independent intellectual movement,and its collapse was in fact the result of such an independence.

关 键 词：青年黑格尔派 解体 恩格斯 麦克莱伦 哈贝马斯 

分 类 号：B516.39[哲学宗教—外国哲学]