检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邱晶青 汤天凤[2] 薛缪群[2] 孙蓉蓉[2] 韩光曙[2] Qiu Jingqing;Tang Tianfeng;Xue Miaoqun;Sun Rongrong;Han Guangshu(Institute for Hospital Management of Tsinghua University,Beijing,100084;The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School,Nanjing,Jiangsu,210008)
机构地区:[1]清华大学医院管理研究院,北京100084 [2]南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院,江苏南京210008
出 处:《江苏卫生事业管理》2018年第9期1033-1037,共5页Jiangsu Health System Management
基 金:南京医学科技发展重点项目(ZKX160047);南京大学医院管理研究所基金(NDYG2016009)
摘 要:目的:分析某三甲医院原发性支气管肺癌临床路径的实施效果,探索临床路径优化策略。方法:选择2016年收治的572例原发性支气管肺癌患者,其中314例为临床路径入径组,其余258例为未入径组,比较优化前后入径组和未入径组的性别、年龄、平均住院日、住院费用等。结果:按DRG分组细化临床路径管理后,住院费用管理较分组前有了较大的提升。结论:本次优化策略证明有效。Objective:To analyze the implementation of the clinical pathway of primary bronchial lung cancer in a Tertiary Level A hospital and to explore the optimization strategies.Method:314 out of 572 patients with primary bronchial lung cancer who were admitted via clinical pathways were classified as intake group,and 258 were classified non-intake group.The gender,age,average length of stay,cost were compared before and after optimization between intake group and non-intake group.Results:After refining the clinical pathway using DRG,the management of cost was greatly improved.Conclusion:The optimization strategies proved effective.
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42