《苍颉篇》之流传与“苍颉、仓颉”孰是考  

The Study of Cangjie Pian

作　　者：孙新梅[1] Sun Xin-mei

机构地区：[1]河南省图书馆

出　　处：《图书馆理论与实践》2018年第8期51-56,共6页Library Theory and Practice

摘　　要：《苍颉篇》是继周代《史籀篇》之后的第二部识字读本,东汉许慎《说文解字》多有继承,它在中国文字学史上占有举足轻重的地位,今人对于《苍颉篇》的研究,多有空白与可商榷之处。拙文在梳理《苍颉篇》成书与流传的基础上,考察了它到底有哪些注本,推断了各种版本的亡佚时间;通过对传世文献以及出土文献征引情况的调查,考证了"苍颉"与"仓颉"孰是孰非,并对"苍颉""仓颉"的出现时间进行了界定。Cangjie Pian,the second literacy reading book after Zhou Dai’s Cangjie Pian,has played an extremely important role in the history of literacy textbook in China.Nowadays,there are many gaps and negotiable issues in the study of Cangjie Pian such as the identification of its annotation and disappearance time etc.This article investigates different kinds of the annotated books and infers the lost time of its various versions.Basis on the archaeological finds and compilation document about Cangjie Pian,this article carries on a comprehensive research.

关 键 词：《苍颉篇》 《秦三苍》 《汉三苍》 苍颉汉简 

分 类 号：G256[文化科学—图书馆学]