文献考证的“二难选择”——《文心雕龙·宗经》“铭”字复见校勘之反思  

Dilemma in textual research:Reflections on emendations of the repeated word “ming” in Revering the Classics of The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons

作　　者：李平[1] LI Ping(Anhui University,Wuhu 241000,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学,芜湖241000

出　　处：《云南大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第5期83-95,共13页The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：2015年度国家社科基金项目"海峡两岸‘龙学’比较研究"(项目号:15BZW040);2014年度国家社科基金重大项目"东亚<诗品><文心雕龙>文献研究集成"(项目号:14ZDB068)子课题"东亚文心雕龙研究文献"阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：《文心雕龙·宗经》"铭"字复见问题历来是校勘学家关注的焦点,以范文澜校注的前后变化为例,明清以来复见之"铭"的校勘情况大致有两种趋势:唐写本发现之前,校勘者基本都认可朱郁仪所校之"移"字;唐写本发现之后,校勘者又几乎一边倒地认为唐写本所作"盟"字是。作"移"有道理,作"盟"有依据,两者是非曲直的背后,映现的是刘勰宗经的思想基础和人们对经典与文章之间关系的认识角度。The repeated word“ming”in Revering the Classics of The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons g has been a major concern of its emendators for centuries.This paper gives a case study of the changes before and after Fan Wenlan s annotations and concludes that the emendations of the repeated word"ming"since the Ming and Qing dynasties demonstrate roughly two trends:before the manuscript of The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons of the Tang Dynasty was found,most of the emendators accepted Zhu Yuyi s correction of“ming”into“yi”;after the emergence of the version of The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons in the Tang Dynasty,nearly all emendators agreed that“meng”in the manuscript should the right word.Given that“yi”is reasonable and“meng”valid,the arguments behind both reflect the ideological foundation of Liu Xie s Revering the Classics and cognitive perspectives on the relationship between classics and writing.

关 键 词：文心雕龙 宗经 铭 移 盟 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]