三阶层犯罪论体系下体育不法侵害行为的责任阻却事由解析——基于社会相当性的理论思考  

Analysis of obstacles to the responsibility of sports unlawful infringement behaviors from the perspective of the three-class crime system——Rational thinking based on social equivalence

作　　者：王桢[1] WANG Zhen(School of Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《体育学刊》2018年第5期40-45,共6页Journal of Physical Education

基　　金：中国法学会法学研究课题基金(CLS-D16065)

摘　　要：体育不法侵害行为的刑法认定是长久困扰司法实践的难题,究其原因是缺乏对责任阻却事由的研究。体育正当化学说只是在违法性层面展开的论证,对不法侵害行为的责任阻却研究并无帮助,而社会相当性理论的责任评价与社会伦理解释机能,使其成为责任阻却事由研究的首选之项。与传统的责任阻却事由不同,社会相当性不以行为人为根据,而是立足于行为的特殊性,反映出群众的法感情与法观念,体现体育行业反制刑事司法过度保护的诉求。而模糊性、易变性等缺陷决定该理论若想实际运用,在抽象解释时必须受范围与条件的严格限制;在具体认定时更要受类型化、必然性、伦理性、区域性等4维制约。The criminal identification of sports unlawful infringement behaviors is a problem that has been troubling judicial practice for a long time,whose reason is the lack of a study of obstacles to responsibility.The theory of sports justification is just argumentation carried out at the illegality level,helpless for the study of obstacles to the responsibility of unlawful infringement behaviors,while the responsibility evaluation and social ethic explanation functions of the theory of social equivalence make it become the top choice for studying obstacles to responsibility.Different from traditional obstacles to responsibility,social equivalence does not base the criterion on behaviors,but bases the foundation on behavioral particularity,reflects people’s law emotions and conceptions,and embodies the sports industry’s appeal for counteracting criminal justice’s over protection.However,defects such as ambiguous and variable decide that if this theory is to be actually applied,it must be strictly restricted by scope and condition during abstractive interpretation,or restricted by such 4 dimensions as type,inevitability,ethicality and region during specific identification.

关 键 词：体育法 体育运动 不法侵害行为 责任阻却事由 社会相当性 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]