检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:盛明科[1] 罗娟 Sheng Mingke;Luo Juan(School of Public Administration,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan 411105,China)
出 处:《科技进步与对策》2018年第18期127-134,共8页Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基 金:湖南省社科成果评审委项目(2015ZD01)
摘 要:在新科技革命和产业革命迅猛发展、国际经济格局深度调整的背景下,一国科技战略与政策愈来愈明显地表达出国家竞争战略的意志。同为金砖五国中的两支重要力量,中国与印度两国的科技创新战略与政策一直备受关注。以印度《2013科学、技术和创新政策》与中国《国家创新驱动发展战略纲要》为例,运用比较研究的方法分析二者异同点,发现其均是全球科技产业变革的产物,且将科学技术产业化和人力资源建设作为政策的核心内容;但在发展程度上中国的科技创新政策总体领先于印度,而印度的包容性创新理念也值得中国借鉴。最后,有针对性地从民生建设、人才培养、产业集聚等方面提出了有利于完善中国特色科技创新战略与政策的对策建议。As two important BRIC powers,the strategies and policies for science and technology innovation in China and India have drawn much attention.Taking the Indian"Science,Technology and Innovation Policy 2013"and China's"National Innovation Driven Development Strategy Outline"as an example,the article compares and contrasts the similarities and differences between the two by using the comparative research method and holds that all of them are the products of the global technological industry transformation and that science and technology industrialization and human resources construction as the core content of the policy.However,in terms of the degree of development,China's overall S&T innovation policy is ahead of India,and India's concept of inclusive innovation deserves China's reference.The paper puts forward countermeasures and suggestions on improving people's livelihood construction,personnel training and industrial agglomeration,which are conducive to improving the strategy and policy of science and technology innovation with Chinese characteristics.
关 键 词:科技创新战略 科技创新政策 STI 国家创新驱动发展战略 中印比较
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249