检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:喻家驹 徐晔[1] YU Jiaju;XU Ye(School of Statistics,Jiangxi University of Finance and Economic,Nanchang Jiangxi 330013,China)
出 处:《江西师范大学学报(自然科学版)》2018年第5期544-550,共7页Journal of Jiangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学基金(71773041);江西省自然科学基金(20181BAA208208);江西省教育科学"十三五"规划2016年度课题(051)资助项目
摘 要:从家庭资产配置的角度出发,以夏普比率作为家庭资产配置有效性的度量指标,并提出夏普比率规模概念,认为高等教育投资行为会提升家庭资产组合的夏普比率规模而带来正面效用,但同时也会通过降低家庭当期的财富水平而带来负面效用.对家庭效用的具体形式进行假设后,采用Probit模型对CHIP2013年城镇居民调查数据进行分析,发现个体接受高等教育的意愿,与接受高等教育带来的家庭资产组合夏普比率规模的提升水平正相关,与即期财富水平的下降程度负相关.From the perspective of family assets allocations,taking Sharp ratio as the measure of the effectiveness of family assets allocations and putting forward the concept of scale of Sharp ratio,it is believed that the action of higher education investment will increase the scale of Sharp ratio of the portfolio of family assets so as to make the positive effects,but also will have negative effects by reducing the level of family wealth in the current period.After assuming the specific form of household utility,Probit model is used to analyze the survey data of urban residents in CHIP 2013.It is found that the willingness of individuals to receive higher education is positively related to the improvement of the scale of sharp ratio of family assets,and negatively related to the decline of spot wealth.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.244