检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:史艳红 Shi Yanhong(Changzhi Branch of Shanxi TV University,Changzhi,Shanxi,046000)
机构地区:[1]山西广播电视大学长治分校,山西长治046000
出 处:《山西广播电视大学学报》2018年第3期48-53,共6页Journal of Shanxi Radio & TV University
摘 要:教唆犯罪的实行过限是一个非常复杂和具有挑战性的问题,学界对此有不同的看法。对于教唆犯罪中实行过限问题的准确认定直接关系到刑事责任的归属。在具体案件中,过于抽象则不能准确界定实行过限,从而不能应对复杂问题,对于教唆犯中实行过限的认定要坚持主客观相统一的原则,准确区分不同类型的教唆犯罪,综合考虑教唆人的犯罪目的、背景,被教唆人的犯罪手段等来认定教唆犯罪的过限问题。The surplus behaviors in abetting crime is a very complicated and challenging problem,and the academic circles have different views on it.The accurate identification of surplus behaviors in abetting crime is directly related to the attribution of criminal responsibility.In specific cases,too abstract can not accurately define the surplus behaviors,and thus can not cope with the complex problems.For the identification of surplus behaviors in abetting crime,we must uphold the principle of unity of subjectivity and objectivity,accurately distinguish the different types of abetting crime,and comprehensively consider the purpose and background of the abettor’s crime,the means of being abetted,etc.to identify the problem of abetting crime.
分 类 号:G725[文化科学—成人教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.128.199.33