《玄应音义》引《尚书》考  

The Study on xuanying yinyi quoting from shangshu

作　　者：李福言[1] LI Fuyan(College of Liberal Arts,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330022,China)

机构地区：[1]江西师范大学文学院,江西南昌330022

出　　处：《河池学院学报》2018年第4期63-68,共6页Journal of Hechi University

基　　金：江西省哲学社会科学2016年青年项目(16YY17)

摘　　要：《玄应音义》引《尚书》既有《尚书》经文又有经传注释,注释以孔安国为主,称《尚书》孔传为孔注或孔安国注,另有王肃注和范宁注各一例,未见孔颖达《尚书正义》和陆德明《尚书音义》。与今本《尚书》相比一致性较高,差异表现为脱文、衍文、异文、形讹、节引、意引、义得两通、音近假借等特点。通过《尚书》文献源流考察,推知《玄应音义》引《尚书》及伪孔传部分,当来源于十三卷的《古文尚书》,而王肃注和范宁注部分,当分别来源于十卷的《尚书》王肃注和十卷的《尚书》范宁注。由于《玄应音义》和孔颖达《尚书正义》所选《尚书》经、注有共同的来源,所以导致二者在版本上一致性较高。但二者在后来的传抄刊刻过程中,都可能受卫包《今字尚书》的影响,造成文字错讹。xuanying yinyi is cited shangshu both Scripture and classical works notes,notes to Konganguo-based,another Wangsu note and Fanning note each case,did not see Kongyingda’s shangshu zhengyi and Ludeming shangshu yinyi.Compared with this book,the consistency is higher,and the difference shows as the carets,the text,the different,the form false,the festival,the meaning,the two meanings,the sound near the pretext of the characteristics.Through the literature origin of shangshu,deduce xuanying yinyi should sound meaning cited shangshu and Pseudo-hole transmission part,when deriving from 13 volumes of“Ancient prose”,and Wangsu Note and Fanning note part,the difference from 10 volumes of shangshu Wang Su Note and 10 volumes of shangshu Fanning note.Because of the xuanyingyinyi and Kongyingda’s shangshu zhengyi Selected shangshu,the note has a common source,so that the version of the consistency is higher.But both,in the later copied publication process,may be influenced by the Guardian package jinzi shangshu,resulting in the inappropriateness of the text.

关 键 词：玄应音义 尚书 引文 文献学 

分 类 号：H109.2[语言文字—汉语]