检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:乐爱国[1] Le Aiguo
机构地区:[1]厦门大学哲学系
出 处:《东南学术》2018年第6期40-47,247,共9页Southeast Academic Research
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目“百年朱子学研究精华集成”(项目编号:12JZD007)
摘 要:朱熹讲理气不离不杂,并进一步讲"理先气后"。明代蔡清不赞同朱熹讲理先气后,罗钦顺质疑朱熹的"理与气决是二物",实际上包含了对理先气后的否定。明末清初的陆世仪不同意蔡清、罗钦顺的观点,强调朱熹既讲理气不离不杂、理在气中,又讲理先气后,并把理先气后诠释为"所以然在先"。现代学者冯友兰把朱熹的理先气后诠释为"逻辑在先",唐君毅诠释为"形上之先",牟宗三诠释为"形而上的先在"。这实际上构成了围绕着朱熹的理先气后而展开的学术脉络,其中,陆世仪的诠释承前启后,开现代诠释理先气后之先河。分析陆世仪、冯友兰、唐君毅、牟宗三的诠释及其间的异同,有助于对朱熹的理先气后作出更深入的诠释。Zhu Xi spoke about no separation between li and qi and further interpreted“li first and qi next”.In the Ming dynasty,Cai Qing disagreed to Zhu Xi’s“li first and qi next”;Luo Qinshun questioned Zhu Xi’s idea of“li and qi are definitely two matters”,which was thought to be against his concept of“li first and qi next”.In the late Ming and early Qing Dynasties,Lu Shiyi disagreed with Cai Qing and Luo Qinshun and stressed that Zhu Xi had not only spoken about no separation of li and qi and li in qi but also about“li first and qi next”,thus interpreting it as“the reason lying ahead”.Feng Youlan,a modern scholar,explained Zhu Xi’s“li first and qi next”as“Logic lying ahead”and Tang Junyi regarded it as“metaphysics the first”;similarly,Mou Zongsan explained it as“metaphysical preexistence”.All these have actually constituted a sequence of academic thoughts on Zhu Xi’s“li first and qi next”.In this sequence of thoughts,Lu Shiyi’s explanation serves as a link between predecessors and descendents,?creating a precedent for a modern interpretation of“li first and qi next”.This analysis on the interpretation from Lu Shiyi,Feng Youlan,Tang Junyi and Mou Zongsan respectively and its similarities and differences among them is helpful to deeper explanation of Zhu Xi's theory of“li first and qi next”.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.149.194