审判阶段补充侦查的理论反思  

Theoretical Reflections on Supplementary Investigation in the Stage of Trial

作　　者：李辞[1,2] LI Ci(School of Law,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou,Fujian 350116,China;Institute of Law,Chinese Academy of Social Science,Beijing 100720,China))

机构地区：[1]福州大学法学院,福建福州350116 [2]中国社会科学院法学研究所,北京100720

出　　处：《中国石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第5期38-44,共7页Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences)

基　　金：福建省社会科学规划青年项目(FJ2017C004)

摘　　要：根据我国现行法律规范,检察机关可以单方面决定对正处于审判程序中的案件实施补充侦查,法庭对此几乎不享有审查空间。审判阶段的补充侦查违背了控辩平等原则、迅速审判原则,造成控诉权与审判权的冲突,破坏了庭审的集中性,削弱了诉讼期间制度对审查起诉活动的约束效力。审判阶段的庭外证据调查应由法官依职权进行,且法院一般只能做有利于被告人的庭外调查。In the stage of trial,China s prosecutors have the power to initiate supplementary investigation within existing laws and courts basically have no space to review such behaviors.Supplementary investigation during the stage of trial might contradict the norm of Equality of Prosecution and Defense,as well as Speedy Trial.It would also give rise to the conflicts between the exercise of accusation function and adjudicatory function,and might have impacts on proceedings concentration,weaken the binding effect that suit term brings to the procedure of prosecution.The out-of-court evidence investigation ought to be led by the court,and such investigation should be in favor of the defendant as a general rule.

关 键 词：补充侦查 庭外调查 控辩平等 以审判为中心 

分 类 号：D915[政治法律—诉讼法学]