贿赂物的解构及重塑——从概念思维到类型思维的嬗变  

The Deconstruction and Reconstruction of Bribery——Evolution from Concept Thought to Type Thought

作　　者：段威[1] 林毓敏 DUAN Wei;LIN Yu-min(Institute of Law,Tianjin Academy of Social Sciences,Tianjin 300191,China)

机构地区：[1]天津社会科学院法学研究所,天津300191

出　　处：《天津法学》2018年第4期25-31,共7页Tianjin Legal Science

摘　　要：以贿赂犯罪为代表的经济类犯罪的手段和形式愈加复杂化,其中又以贿赂物的范围变化最为引人关注,从传统的权钱交易到权色交易、权权交易,再到如今为人们所热议的"雅贿"等。归因于复杂化、碎片化的生活事实,滞后、模糊的刑法规范条文,以概念思维为核心的刑事裁判方式显得独木难支。尽管学者不断试图从贿赂物的概念或范围进行解释,但囿于文字的抽象性、局限性以及事实的多样性、复杂性,此种努力仍旧难以填平现行刑法规范与司法实践的空白地带。对此,类型化思维模式的运用可以在一定程度上弥补概念思维的不足,秉承着"类似案件类似处理"的原则,在解决司法实践中的疑难杂症方面,颇有益处。The rapid development of economy constantly urges people to pursue diversification of interests.The means and forms of economic crimes represented by bribery crime are becoming more and more complicated.Among them,the scope change of bribes attracts the most attention,from traditional power and money transactions to power and sex transactions,power and power transactions,and now the popular“elegant bribery”and so on.Due to the complicated and fragmented facts of life,the lagging and vague provisions of criminal law norms,the criminal judgment mode with conceptual thinking as the core appears to be unique and difficult.Although scholars have been trying to explain the concept or scope of bribery,it is still difficult to fill the gap between the current criminal law norms and judicial practice because of the abstractness,limitations of the text,the diversity and complexity of the facts.In this regard,the application of typed thinking mode can make up for the deficiency of conceptual thinking to a certain extent.Adhering to the principle of“similar cases being handled similarly”,it is beneficial to solve the difficult and complicated problems in judicial practice.

关 键 词：贿赂物 概念思维 类型思维 

分 类 号：D914.1[政治法律—刑法学]