我国刑事实践下期待可能性的适用  

The Application of Anticipated Possibility under the Criminal Practice in China

作　　者：李杨[1] LI Yang(Kenneth Wang School of Law,Suzhou University,Suzhou Jiangsu 215000, China)

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院,江苏苏州215000

出　　处：《重庆电子工程职业学院学报》2018年第5期26-30,共5页Journal of Chongqing College of Electronic Engineering

摘　　要：期待可能性理论以相对的意志自由论为哲学根据,彰显了刑法的人性关怀,因其具有的合理性受到我国学者的青睐。但是,我国的立法实践和司法实践直接适用期待可能性理论具有难以克服的困境。在我国刑事实践下适用期待可能性理论,立法出路应基于期待可能性思想增修刑法分则的相关罪名;司法的出路是,法官应该先穷尽刑法典中的出罪或宽免条文,再适用期待可能性思想作最后的调节性评价,遵循"定罪—量刑—调节性评价"的先后步骤。Based on the relative freedom of will,the theory of anticipated possibility reveals the human nature solicitude of criminal law,favored by Chinese scholars for its rationality.However,it is difficult to apply the theory of anticipated possibility directly both in the legislation and judicial practice in China.In order to apply the theory of anticipated possibility in criminal practice in China,the way out of legislation should be based on the thought of expected possibility to increase and modify some of the charges in the criminal law.The way out for judicial practice is that the judge should first use the provisions of the criminal law to offend or mitigate the punishment,and then apply the thought of expected possibility as the final adjustment means to judge the steps of"conviction-sentencing-regulative evaluation”.

关 键 词：期待可能性 困境 刑事实践 调节性评价 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]