数字化和传统方法制作全瓷贴面的疗效比较  

Comparison of clinical effects between digital methods and traditional methods for making all-ceramic veneers

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:杨骏[1] 朱洪水[1] 谭胜 YANG Jun;ZHU Hongshui;TAN Sheng(the Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanchang University,Nanchang,330006;Department of Stomatology,Nanfeng People's Hospital Nanfeng,Jiangxi Nanfeng,344500,China)

机构地区:[1]南昌大学附属口腔医院,南昌330006 [2]江西省南丰县人民医院口腔科,南丰344500

出  处:《江西医药》2018年第11期1208-1210,共3页Jiangxi Medical Journal

基  金:江西省卫生计生委科技计划项目;编号20175219

摘  要:目的评价分析数字化方法和传统方法制作全瓷贴面的临床效果。方法选取46例患者,利用数字化方法制作全瓷贴面22个,利用传统方法制作全瓷贴面24个。修复半年后复查,采用改良的美国公共卫生健康(USPHS)标准对2组全瓷贴面的各项临床指标进行分析和对比。结果 2组患者颜色匹配及全瓷表面质地、边缘适合性比较,差异无统计学意义,数字化方法组的患者舒适度要优于传统方法组。结论数字化方法和传统方法制作的全瓷贴面均可以达到比较好的临床疗效,但采用数字化方法制作,患者的就诊次数和时间明显减少,就医体验更好,更适合临床推广。Objective Evaluating and analyzing the clinical effects between digital methods and traditional methods for making all-ceramic veneers.Methods 22 digital porcelain veneers and 24traditional porcelain veneers were made from 46 patients.Six months after restoration,The clinical indicators,The abscission rate and Patient comfort of porcelain veneers made by the two methods were analyzed and compared with the modified USPHS.Results There was no significant difference in color matching and porcelain surface texture and marginal adaptation between the two groups;patients comfort in the digital method group was significantly better than that in the traditional method group.Conclusion The digital method and the traditional method of making porcelain veneers both are effective in clinical application.But with the digital method,the number of visits and visiting time decreased,and the experience was better,Digital technology is more suitable for clinical promotion.

关 键 词:全瓷贴面 数字化技术 临床效果 

分 类 号:R783.1[医药卫生—口腔医学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象