检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张同韩[1] 刘晓玲[2] 吴纪楠[1] 陈觉尧[1] 苏葵[1] 郑巧仪[1] Zhang Tonghan;Liu Xiaoling;Wu Jinan;Chen Jueyao;Su Kui;Zheng Qiaoyi(Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,The Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital,Sun Yat-sen University,Zhongshan528403,China;Department of Medical Intensive Care Unit,The Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital,Sun Yat-sen University,Zhongshan528403,China)
机构地区:[1]中山市人民医院.口腔分院口腔颌面外科,528403 [2]中山市人民医院.口腔分院内科重症监护室,528403
出 处:《中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版)》2018年第6期354-359,共6页Chinese Journal of Stomatological Research(Electronic Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81302365);中山市社会公益科技研究医疗重大专项(2017B1008)
摘 要:目的探讨大型颌骨囊性病变的开窗减压治疗效果。方法 2013—2017年在中山市人民医院·口腔分院口腔颌面外科就诊的大型颌骨囊性病变患者18例,均采用开窗减压治疗术,观察术后3年囊腔的变化情况。结果术后随访1~3年,15例患者囊腔基本消失、2例复发、1例治疗无效(改为传统的手术)。开窗治疗的病例病变区域骨质生长恢复良好,临床症状消除。结论大型颌骨囊性病变的开窗减压治疗切实可行。对于病变累及的患牙牙髓尽量保留,待囊腔周围骨质生长回后,开窗减压治疗术后1年时根据活力测试考虑是否需要根管治疗。Objective To explore the effect of fenestration for large jaw cystic lesions.Methods Eighteen cases of large odontogenic cyst of maxillofacial areas in our department in2013-2017years were treated with fenestration,and the changes of cysts in3years after the operation were observed.Results After1-3years of follow-up,the cystic cavity disappeared in15cases,2cases recurred and1case was not effective,which was treated by traditional operation.In the cases of fenestration,the bone growth in the lesion area recovered well,and the clinical symptoms were eliminated.Conclusions Fenestration for large jaw bone cystic lesions is feasible.The pulp of the affected teeth was preserved as far as possible.After the bone growth around the capsule,the root canal therapy was considered one year after the fenestration according to the dental pulp test.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.233