检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁修真[1] DING Xiu-zhen(Department of History and Society,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu Anhui 241002, China)
机构地区:[1]安徽师范大学历史与社会学院,安徽芜湖241002
出 处:《安徽师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2019年第1期83-90,共8页Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目(13CZS018)
摘 要:在科举人才地理学术命题的发展脉络中,丁文江《历史人物与地理的关系》一文无疑具有开创意义。该文的研究范式及其存在的问题,也为此后大多数相关研究所承袭。正因为如此,近三十年来,科举人才地理研究在取得丰硕成果的同时,也招致了部分学者"千篇一律,难出新意"的批评。时下科举人才地理的出路,需注意在实践原有范式的旧途之中,寻找新的方向,克服过于依赖归纳法所带来的缺陷。近年来兴起的专经研究则是走向新途的一条可能路径。In the development of the geography academic proposition of the imperial examinations,Ding Wenjiang's article The Relationship between Historical Figures and Geography is undoubtedly of pioneering significance.The research paradigm of this paper and its existing problems are also inherited by most relevant research institutes.Because of this,in the past three decades,the geography research of the imperial examinations has yielded fruitful results,and it has also attracted criticisms from some scholars that they are"one size fits all,and new ideas are difficult to come up with".Nowadays,the way out for the geography of the imperial examinations requires attention to find new directions in the old way of practicing the original paradigm and overcome the shortcomings of relying too much on inductive methods.The study of professional scriptures that has arisen in recent years is a possible path to a new path.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.69