我国执行程序中当事人适格救济制度之完善——以域外执行文制度与许可执行制度为镜鉴  

Perfection of the system of party's appropriate relief in the execution procedure——using the extraterritorial execution file system and the licensed execution system for reference

作　　者：方铮 Fang Zheng(Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120

出　　处：《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2018年第6期95-100,共6页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice

摘　　要：执行力主观范围的扩张,使执行程序之适格主体不同于执行名义的记载。执行当事人适格与否所产生的争议属于实体权利义务争议,应赋予相应的实体性执行救济。对此,我国现行立法仅规定适用范围有限的执行异议之诉,救济方式存在非讼化倾向。通过对域外执行当事人适格救济主要制度模式的考察并结合审执分立之考虑,在我国建构许可执行之诉及其前置程序具备必要性与可行性。制度设计上应明确程序性与实体性救济途径之关系,并明确许可执行之诉的审理范围。The expansion of the subjective scope of executive power makes the appropriate subject of the execution procedure different from the record of the execution.The dispute arising from the suitability of the execution party belongs to the dispute of the entity’s rights and obligations,and the corresponding entity relief should be given.In this regard,China’s current legislation only stipulates the application of objection to the limited scope of application,so that the relief has a tendency to be non-litigation.Through the investigation of the main system and model of the extraterritorial execution party’s appropriate relief and the consideration of the separation of trials and executions,it is necessary and feasible to construct the litigation of licensed execution and the pre-procedure in China.The system design should clarify the relationship between the procedural and substantive relief,and the scope of the litigation of licensed execution.

关 键 词：执行救济 执行力扩张 执行文 许可执行 

分 类 号：DF728[政治法律—诉讼法学]