检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙仕田[1] 郭长香[1] SUN Shitian;GUO Changxiang(Linyi City Mental Health Center, Linyi Shandong 276005, China)
出 处:《中国民康医学》2018年第24期91-92,125,共3页Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
摘 要:目的:观察认知行为疗法结合万拉法新治疗焦虑症的临床效果。方法:选取62例焦虑症患者作为观察对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组和观察组各31例。对照组给予万拉法新治疗,观察组在对照组基础上给予认知行为疗法治疗。治疗3个月后,比较两组焦虑情况(HAMA量表)、功能状态(GAF量表)和疗效。结果:治疗后,观察组HAMA量表评分明显低于对照组,GAF量表评分明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组治疗总有效率为83.87%,明显高于对照组的58.06%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:认知行为疗法结合万拉法新治疗焦虑症的效果优于单纯万拉法新治疗,可显著改善患者的病情。Objective: To explore clinical effects of cognitive behavioral therapy combined with Venlafaxine in treatment of anxiety. Methods: 62 patients with anxiety were selected and randomly divided into two groups according to the random number table method. Each group consisted of 31 patients. The observation group was treated with cognitive behavioral therapy combined with Venlafaxine, while the control group was treated with simple Venlafaxine. 3 months after the treatment, the anxiety status(HAMA scale), functional status(GAF scale), and the effects were compared between the two groups. Results: After the treatment, the HAMA score of the observation group was signifi cantly lower than that of the control group, the GAF score was signifi cantly higher than that of the control group, and the differences were statistically signifi cant(P<0.05). The total effective rate of the observation group was 83.87%, which was signifi cantly higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically signifi cant(P<0.05). Conclusions: Cognitive behavioral therapy combined with Venlafaxine is superior to Venlafaxine in the treatment of anxiety, which can signifi cantly improve the patients’ conditions.
分 类 号:R749.72[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.102.106