基于供应链的纺织行业节能减排决策  

Decision of energy-saving and emission-reduction in textile industry based on supply chain

作　　者：王晓锋[1] 朱晨 袁阴 WANG Xiaofeng;ZHU Chen;YUAN Yin(Glorious Sun School of Business&Management,Donghua University,Shanghai 200051,China)

机构地区：[1]东华大学旭日工商管理学院,上海200051

出　　处：《纺织学报》2019年第1期166-174,共9页Journal of Textile Research

基　　金：国家自然科学基金重点项目(71832001);教育部人文社科基金项目(14YJC630130);上海市哲学社会科学规划课题资助项目(2017BGL014)

摘　　要：为使纺织企业在环保税背景下更好应对节能减排压力,根据纺织企业生产工序特点建立由纺织企业和品牌商构成的两级供应链模型和加入回收商进行回收再利用的三级供应链模型,研究2种模型下的节能减排决策。通过斯塔克伯格(Stackelberg)博弈求解各产品最优定价、最优利润以及最优减排率。研究结果表明:三级供应链模型较两级供应链模型下拥有更高的新品零售价格和更高的新品市场需求,同时可降低最优减排率,纺织品回收再利用是纺织企业走出困境的有效措施。政府制定合理的税收标准可有效地刺激纺织企业投入节能减排技术和回收再利用,同时提高供应链利润,实现环境效益和经济利益的双赢。For helping the textile enterprises to better face the pressure from energy saving and emission reduction under the background of environmental protection taxes,the decision of energy-saving and emission-reduction in textile supply chain was studied using two types of models based on the characteristics of textile production process.One is the two-level supply chain model composed of textile enterprises and brand manufacturers,and the other one is the three-level one by adding the recyclers for recycling.By Stackelberg game,the optimal pricing,optimal profit and optimal emission reduction rate of each product were obtained.The research results show that the three-level supply chain model has a higher retail price and demand for new products than that of the two-level supply chain model.In the meanwhile,the optimal emission reduction rate could be reduced.Recycling of textiles are effective measures for textile enterprises to overcome their difficulties.By setting reasonable tax standards,the government can effectively stimulate textile enterprises to invest in energy-saving and emission-reduction and improve the supply chain profits,achieving a win-win strategy in both environmental and economic benefits.

关 键 词：节能减排 回收再利用 STACKELBERG博弈 定价决策 

分 类 号：F273[经济管理—企业管理] TS941[经济管理—国民经济]