检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄娟[1] 张达龙 HUANG Juan;ZHANG Da-long(School of Accounting,Southwestern University of Finance and Economics,Chengdu 611130,China)
出 处:《财经理论研究》2019年第1期96-112,共17页Journal of Finance and Economics Theory
摘 要:本文以2012-2016年我国A股上市公司为样本,检验高管权力、媒体关注与高管私有收益之间的关系。研究发现,高管权力与高管私有收益显著正相关,媒体关注能够显著抑制高管权力对高管私有收益的正向作用。进一步研究发现,国企高管更偏好非货币性私有收益,非国企高管更偏好货币性私有收益;央企高管更偏好非货币性私有收益,地方国企高管更偏好货币性私有收益。此外,媒体关注能够显著抑制央企高管权力对高管私有收益的正向作用,但不能显著抑制地方国企高管权力对高管私有收益的正向作用。Based on China′s A-share listed companies from 2012 to 2016,this paper investigates the relationship between executive power,media attention,and executive private benefits.The study finds that executive power is significantly positively related to executive private benefits.Media attention can significantly curb the positive effect of executive power on executive private benefits.Further research found that SOE executives prefer non-monetary private benefits,non-SOE executives prefer monetary private benefits,central SOE executives prefer non-monetary private benefits,and local SOE executives prefer monetary private benefits.In addition,media attention can significantly inhibit the positive effects of executive power of central SOEs on executive private benefits,but it can not significantly curb the positive effect of local SOE executives′power on executive private benefits.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222