桐城派早期作家的明季史事书写  

A Study on Early Tongcheng-School Writers' Description of the Late Ming Dynasty

作　　者：师雅惠[1] SHI Ya-hui(Department of Chinese Language & Literature,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,Fujian)

机构地区：[1]厦门大学中文系,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《厦门大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2019年第1期130-141,共12页Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)

摘　　要：清代桐城派早期作家戴名世、朱书、方苞等人,均有志于著史,特别是明末史事的写作。这一创作兴趣,体现了清初官方史学与私家史学的兴盛、皖北沿江一带的历史文化特点与诸人自身学术志向的多重影响。在史观上,戴名世、朱书有较为浓厚的民族主义思想,承认南明统绪的存在,并对明末党争采取了唯其是不唯其人的持平态度。方苞则往往回避明清断限问题,在党争问题上则赞同东林一派史家的意见,更强调史著的教化作用。在史法上,戴名世、朱书的文字,较为宏阔,其文不可用明确的法度来阐释;方苞则较注重行文法度,下笔不免拘谨。"《南山集》案"后,戴、朱著述零落殆尽,在后世影响甚微。方苞所追求的思想与文辞的雅洁、规范,则成为桐城派文章的代表性风格。The paper explores the historical works on the late Ming Dynasty by the early Tongcheng-school writers.By comparing the different positions of the early Tongcheng-school writers on legitimacy of the Southern Ming Dynasty and the party struggle in the late Ming Dynasty,and analyzing the delicate structure of the historical works written by the early Tongcheng-school writers,it suggests that there are obvious differences in the early Tongcheng School writers'historical views and writing styles.In contrast with the national standpoint and complicated structure of Dai Mingshi and Zhu Shu's historical works,Fang Bao's historical works pays more attention to the personal morality of historical figures and has a concise writing style.

关 键 词：桐城派早期作家 明末 历史书写 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]