检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭梦迪 韩继冲[1,2] 施玥 邵怀勇 杨青林[1] GUO Mengdi;HAN Jichong;SHI Yue;SHAO Huaiyong;YANG Qinglin(Key Laboratory of Information Technology&Application of Land and Resource, Chengdu University of Technology,Chengdu610059,China;School of Earth Science,Chengdu University of Technology,Chengdu610059,China)
机构地区:[1]国土资源部地学空间信息技术重点实验室,成都610059 [2]成都理工大学地球科学学院,成都610059
出 处:《物探化探计算技术》2019年第1期128-134,共7页Computing Techniques For Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration
基 金:国家自然科学青年基金项目(41302282);四川省教育厅自然科学基础重点研究基金项目(13ZA0059)
摘 要:针对目前生态环境脆弱性评价中存在的评价指标选取片面性、脆弱性动态变化研究薄弱的问题,基于DPRISM概念框架选取22个指标构建评价指标体系,定量研究岷江上游2000年-2014年生态环境脆弱性动态变化过程。结合岷江上游生态环境特点,建立基于驱动力-压力-状态-影响-响应-管理(DPSIRM)概念框架的生态环境脆弱性评价模型,利用多源数据,包括气象数据,遥感数据,基本地理数据,社会经济数据,计算出EVI(Ecological Vulnerability Index)值,并利用生态环境脆弱性综合指数及其变化率分析研究区生态环境脆弱性时空变化规律。结果表明:①2000年-2014年间研究区生态环境脆弱性呈西部向东部逐渐递减的空间分布特点;②三个时间段内脆弱性均以微度、轻度、中度为主,面积比例分别为:84.15%、84.42%、87.13%;③三个时间段内,研究区生态环境脆弱性综合指数变化率R均小于0,表明研究区生态环境脆弱性值在逐年减小;④14年间,岷江上游生态环境脆弱性呈逐步改善趋势,但该趋势不明显,还需长期坚持生态治理政策。Aiming at the problem of one-sided indicators selection and weight determination existed in the evaluation of eco-environmental vulnerability at present,we selected 22 indicators to build an evaluation index system quantitatively to research the condition of eco-environmental vulnerability of upper reaches of Minjiang river from 2000 to 2014.List the upper reaches of Minjiang river as an example,eco-environmental vulnerability evaluation model was built based on driving force-pressure-state-response-management(DPSIRM)conceptual framework combining its eco-environmental environment characteristics and then we calculated the EVI values by the use of multi-source date including meteorological data,remote sensing data,basic geographic data,social and economic data.Finally,analyzed the spatio-temporal variation rules of eco-environmental vulnerability applying comprehensive index of eco-environmental environment vulnerability and its change rate.The results showed that:(1)From 2000 to 2014,the spatial distribution characteristics of study area's eco-environmental vulnerability showed a trend of decreasing from west to east.(2)Micro degrees,mild,moderate vulnerability became the most in three time periods,area ratio took 84.15%,84.42%,87.13%each.(3)The eco-environmental vulnerability comprehensive index change rate R were all under zero of studied area in three time periods,indicating that eco-environmental vulnerability of study area decreased year by year.(4)The eco-environmental vulnerability of upper reaches of Minjiang river showed a slightly trend of improvement in 14 years,which also needs our insisting ecological management policy.
关 键 词:DPRISM概念框架 生态环境脆弱性 岷江上游 时空动态变化
分 类 号:X171.4[环境科学与工程—环境科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.178